G.B. Shaw on Parsifal in Bayreuth
This web-page will look much better
in a browser that supports worldwide web standards although it is
accessible to any browser. You appear to be using an older browser
that does not support current standards. Please consider upgrading
your browser. We suggest the latest version of any one of the
following: MS Internet Explorer, Opera, Safari or Firefox.
o enjoy Parsifal, either as a
listener or an executant, one must be either a fanatic or a
philosopher. To enjoy Tristan it is only necessary to have
had one serious love affair ...
[G.B. Shaw in The Star, 6
August 1889]
 he much-boasted staging is marred by obsolete
contrivances which would astonish us at the Lyceum as much as a
return to candle-lighting or half-price at nine o'clock. Mr
Mansfield playing Richard III in the dress of Garrick, or Mr Irving
Hamlet in that of Kemble, would seem modern and original compared
with the unspeakable ballroom costume which Madame Materna dons to
fascinate Parsifal in the second
act. The magic flower garden would be
simply the most horribly vulgar and foolish transformation scene
ever allowed to escape from a provincial pantomime, were it not recommended to mercy by a
certain enormous naïveté and a pleasantly childish
love of magnified red blossoms and trailing creepers.
[The Star, 1 August
1889]

Above: Shrine + Grailbearer.
©RW-Gedenkstätte.
|

Above: Sketch of the Grail Shrine by Anton Schnittenheim, Bayreuth
1882.
©RW-Gedenkstätte.
|

Left: Marianne Brandt as Kundry in Act 2, Bayreuth 1882, reclining
on the "Gower St. sofa". ©Richard- Wagner- Gedenkstätte.
to the canvas set piece and
Gower-st. sofa visibly pulled on to the stage with Madame Materna
seductively reposed on it, the steam from a copper under the boards
which filled the house with a smell of laundry and melted axillary
gutta-percha linings, the indescribable impossibility of the wigs
and beards, the characterless historical-school draperies of the
knights, the obvious wire
connexion of the electric light which glowed in the ruby bowl of
the Holy Grail, and the senseless violation
of Wagner's directions by allowing Gurnemanz and Parsifal to walk off the stage whilst the
panoramic change of scene was taking
place in the first act (obviously the absence of the two men who
are supposed to be traversing the landscape reduces the exhibition
to the alternative absurdities of the trees taking a walk or the
auditorium turning round): all these faults show the danger of
allowing to any theatre, however imposing its associations, the
ruinous privilege of exemption from vigilant and implacable
criticism. The performance of Parsifal on Sunday last
suffered additionally from Herr Grüning executing a hornpipe on the
appearance of Klingsor with the
sacred spear; but this was introduced not
as an act of whimsical defiance, but under pressure of the
desperate necessity of disentangling Parsifal's ankle from the snapped string
on which the spear was presently to have flown at him.
[The Star, 1 August
1889]

Right: Flower Maiden costume by Paul von
Joukowsky, Bayreuth 1882. ©Richard- Wagner- Gedenkstätte.
 mpressive as the first Grail scene is, nine-tenths of its effect would be
lost without the "innocent fool" gazing dumbly at it in the corner,
only to be hustled out as a goose when
it is over. His appearance on the rampart of Klingsor's castle, looking down in wonder at the flower maidens in the enchanted garden, is also a memorable point.
And that long kiss of Kundry's from which he learns so much is one
of those pregnant simplicities which stare the world in the face
for centuries and yet are never pointed out except by great
men.
[The Star, 7 August
1889]
 he work produced a great effect - an effect in
some cases of disgust and repulsion, in others of awe and even of
ecstasy; but in all cases a powerful effect. The perfect smoothness
with which the panoramic changes of scenery in the first and third
acts worked, the clever changes from dusk to full light, the beauty
of the temple of the Grail, the smooth
and thoroughly rehearsed choral singing, the magic of the
orchestra, and above all, of course, that prodigious coup
de théâtre, the celebration of the Holy Communion on the
stage, with the sacred chalice glowing with
ruby light, and the Holy Ghost descending in the form of a dove in dazzling celestial radiance, could not fail
to affect very deeply an audience of the somewhat cathedrally class
(if I may use the expression) which alone can afford to go to
Bayreuth. There was an English bishop present yesterday. I shall
not mention his see, lest I should get him into trouble.
[The Star, 20 July
1894]

Left: Amalie Materna, Emil Scaria and Hermann Winkelmann. ©
Richard- Wagner- Gedenkstätte.
 he bass, who was rather flustered, perhaps from
nervousness, was especially brutal in his treatment of the music of
Gurnemanz; and it struck me that
if he had been a trombone player in the band, instead of the
singer, the conductor, Levi of Munich,
would have remonstrated. Indeed, I presently heard a trombone
player, who was helping with the fanfares outside the theatre
between the acts, pulled up by the sub-conductor for being 'a
little too strong'. Accordingly, having the opportunity of
exchanging a few words with Levi
afterwards, I expressed my opinion about the bass in question.
Levi appeared surprised and, declaring
that the singer had the best bass voice in Germany, challenged me
to find anyone who could sing the part better, to which I could
only respond with sufficient emphasis by offering to sing it better
myself, upon which he gave me up as a lunatic.
[The World, 1 August
1894]
|